Sure thing: html
Hupchecker gives content, marketing, and communications leaders a way to see where original thinking lives on their team and put it to work.

See the Original Intelligence composition of an entire content or marketing team in one dashboard, alongside individual OIQ scores and archetypes.
Pair Expanders, who push ideas outward, with Focals, who sharpen and commit to a single idea, so every piece gets both range and a point of view before it goes out.
Original Intelligence is measured on a recurring basis as AI tools and habits change, so a team that scores well today doesn't quietly slide back toward AI-typical output next quarter.
Because Hupchecker measures a person's contribution beyond the baseline, results hold up as new models launch, unlike detection tools that need retraining with every vendor update.
Hupchecker measures Original Intelligence in the people producing your content, not in the documents themselves, so the signal holds up long after a single draft is published.
AI slop isn't a copywriting problem. It's what happens when adoption outpaces judgment, and nobody is measuring the difference between the two.

When everyone leans on the same models with the same prompts, every piece of content starts to read like it share an author. Increasingly, it does.
Rather than showing the original thinking a student brought to the essay, they scan a finished submission for statistical patterns and flag it after the fact.
Once a reader suspects a piece is generic, they discount everything else you publish, including the work that took real judgment to produce.
Statistics from McKinsey's State of AI Report for 2025.
of businesses report using AI in at least one business function.
Of people report negative consequences for their business stemming from AI inaccuracy
of businesses say that they are experimenting with using AI agents in the workflow.